Startup Interview with James Taylor, Founder of Particular Audience (aka Similar Inc)

Written by jameswstaylor | Published 2021/08/01
Tech Story Tags: ecommerce | machine-learning | artificial-intelligence | ai | recommendation-systems | search-engine | startups-of-the-year | particular-audience

TLDR Particular Audience.com is a machine-driven e-commerce startup. It aggregates every item on the consumer web and is good at knowing when to show each one to you. The startup is currently on a $61.5m run rate and expects to finish the year at $100m. Founder and CEO of the company is 21-year-old and has worked with Amazon and other big tech platforms for nearly a decade. He says he is looking to create a different website for every customer.via the TL;DR App

HackerNoon Reporter: Please tell us briefly about your background.

I've spent nearly a decade working in the experience layer of eCommerce. I’ve worked with rules-based systems, and more recently have focused entirely on machine learning applications through Particular Audience.

I’m interested in how information on the web is structured (or not structured) and the signals that can help us define relationships between data, to make our relationship with the internet more symbiotic.

What's your startup called? And in a sentence or two, what does it do?

Brands and merchants know us as Particular Audience (particularaudience.com), and our consumer brand is Similar (similarinc.com). We have managed to aggregate every item on the consumer web and are really really good at knowing when to show each one to you.

Contextual commerce is the umbrella term we identify with.

What is the origin story?

Sick of rules-based approaches to personalization and having segment-based targeting prove perpetually ineffective and unscalable, I started reading up on machine learning applications used by Amazon and other big tech platforms.

I was particularly lucky to get my hands on Anand Rajaraman’s book Mining Massive Datasets where I (after some study) had my perspective flipped on a counterintuitive fact in how to do effective personalization.

Personalization is another word for prediction, how robust your data is plays the most significant role in making accurate predictions.

I learned that user-orientated, and especially segment orientated approaches are ineffective for the following reasons:

  1. merchants have very little data on customers (what % of your life do you spend at Best Buy?)
  2. customers are not commoditized like items are (changing context, interest, budget)
  3. there are more customers than items (you want the data set with the least dimensionality)

We’ve honed our technology leveraging a mix of collaborative filtering, computer vision and natural language processing working with some of the world’s best-known retailers on their search and recommendation systems. Creating a different website for every customer, in a market full of static shopping experiences on monolith eCommerce platforms.

The key questions outstanding are, how can this logic work outside of a single website? Can we create some sort of internet-scale recommendation engine? Wouldn’t that make the internet easier to navigate? Can we automate search based on somebody’s context? To answer these we built ‘Similar’, our first consumer product, which you can add to Chrome now at similarinc.com - check it out, there’s a tonne of exciting applications in the pipeline but it will save you a lot of time and money in the meantime.

What do you love about your team, and why are you the ones to solve this problem?

I’ve been lucky to find myself a part of the most incredible team, we’re now at 40 people globally and it feels like the best mix of skillsets and diverse perspectives I could have hoped to create. Scaling fast meant some incorrect hires, but everyone at PA today is someone I would happily work for in their respective area and that makes for an environment of high standards and mutual respect.

If you weren’t building your startup, what would you be doing?

Probably building someone else’s! Back in 2016 I was considering an MBA but decided to spend the $200k and 2 years building a startup instead, it has worked out to be the right decision so far.

At the moment, how do you measure success? What are your core metrics?

We have several products now and gross merchandise value seems to be the common metric to measure our progress as a business overall. We’re currently on a $61.5m run rate and expect to finish the year at $100m.

There are a lot of metrics that play into that headline measure impacting customers and merchants that use our products such as conversion, basket size, margin, cash:stock ratios, landed cost, operating leverage, money saved etc.

I consider revenue a proxy for how well we are serving our customers, and our revenue will grow around 390% this year. Revenue is also a reflection of our product thinking, and product traction, demonstrating our diversification and experiments in how merchants and shoppers want to interact with one another online.

What’s most exciting about your traction to date?

We’ve recently found our first organic loop, meaning a channel that grows without investment. We’re nurturing it and are excited to see what it can become.

What technologies are you currently most excited about, and most worried about? And why?

I’m most excited about quantum applications for security and encryption. I am most worried about quantum implications for security and encryption 😅.

What advice would you give to the 21-year-old version of yourself?

Probably to skip the investment banking career and get straight into an early stage, high-growth business and learn everything. Also, get some Bitcoin.


Written by jameswstaylor | Growing eCommerce
Published by HackerNoon on 2021/08/01