Exploring the underlying implementation and use cases
If like me and want to have a comprehensive understanding of the change detection mechanism in Angular you’ll have to explore the sources since there is not much information available on the web. Most articles mention that each component has its own change detector which is responsible for checking the component, but they don’t go beyond that and mostly focus on use cases for immutables and change detection strategy. This article provides you with the information required to understand why use cases with immutables work and how change detection strategy affects the check. Also, what you will learn from this article will enable you to come up with various scenarios for performance optimization on your own.
This article consists of two parts. The first part is pretty technical and contains a lot of links to the sources. It explains in detail how the change detection mechanism works under the hood. Its content is based on the newest Angular version — 4.0.1. The way how change detection mechanism is implemented under the hood in this version is different from the earlier 2.4.1. If interested you can read a little about how it worked in this stackoverflow answer.
The second part shows how change detection can be used in the application and its content is applicable for both earlier 2.4.1 and the newest 4.0.1 versions of Angular since public API has not changed.
It’s been mentioned across the tutorials that an Angular application is a tree of components. However, under the hood angular uses a low-level abstraction called view. There is a direct relationship between a view and a component — one view is associated with one component and vice verse. A view holds a reference to the associated component class instance in the component property. All operations like property checks and DOM updates are performed on views, hence it’s more technically correct to state that angular is a tree of views, while a component can be described as a high-level concept of a view. Here is what you can read about the view in the sources:
A View is a fundamental building block of the application UI. It is the smallest grouping of Elements which are created and destroyed together.
Properties of elements in a View can change, but the structure (number and order) of elements in a View cannot. Changing the structure of Elements can only be done by inserting, moving or removing nested Views via a ViewContainerRef. Each View can contain many View Containers.
In this article I will be using notions of component view and component interchangeably.
There are two important things about a component view in the context of change detection. Each view has a link to its child views through nodes property and hence can perform actions on child views. And each view has a state, which plays very important role because based on its value Angular decides whether to run change detection for the view and all its children or skip it. There are four possible states:
- FirstCheck
- ChecksEnabled
- Errored
- Destroyed
Change detection is skipped for the view and its child views if ChecksEnabled is false or view is in the Errored or Destroyed state. By default, all views are initialized with ChecksEnabled unless ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush is used. More on that later. The states can be combined, for example, a view can have both FirstCheck and ChecksEnabled flags set.
Angular has a bunch of high-level concepts to manipulate the views. I’ve written about some of them here. One such concept is ViewRef. It encapsulates the underlying component view and has an aptly named method detectChanges. When an asynchronous event takes place, Angular triggers change detection on its top-most ViewRef, which after running change detection for itself runs change detection for its child views.
The main logic responsible for running change detection for a view resides in checkAndUpdateView function. Most of its functionality performs operations on child component views. When it’s triggered for a particular view it does the following operations in the specified order:
- updates input properties on a child component instance
- updates child view change detection state (part of change detection strategy implementation)
- calls OnChanges lifecycle hook on a child component if bindings changed
- calls OnInit and ngDoCheck on a child component
- calls AfterContentInit, AfterContentChecked, AfterViewInit, AfterViewChecked lifecycle hooks on child component instance
- calls OnDestroy if the child/parent component is destroyed
- updates DOM for the current view if properties on current view component instance changed
- runs change detection for a child view
- disables checks for the current view (part of change detection strategy implementation)
- sets FirstCheck to false
There are few things to highlight based on the operations listed above.
The first thing is that onChanges lifecycle hook is triggered on a child component before the child view is checked and it will be triggered even if changed detection for the child view will be skipped. This is important information and we will see how we can leverage this knowledge in the second part of the article.
The second thing is that DOM for a view is updated as part of a change detection mechanism while the view being checked. This means that if a component is not checked, the DOM is not updated even if component properties used in a template change.
Another interesting observation is that state of a child component view can be changed during change detection. I mentioned earlier that all component views are initialized with ChecksEnabled by default, but for all components that use OnPush strategy change detection is disabled after the first check (operation 9 in the list):
if (view.def.flags & ViewFlags.OnPush) {
view.state &= ~ViewState.ChecksEnabled;
}
It means that during the following change detection run the check will be skipped for this component view and all its children. The documentation about the OnPush strategy states that a component will be checked only if its bindings have changed. So to do that the checks have to be enabled by setting ChecksEnabled bit. And this is what the following code does (operation 2):
if (compView.def.flags & ViewFlags.OnPush) {
compView.state |= ViewState.ChecksEnabled;
}
The state is updated only if parent view bindings changed and child component view was initialized with ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush.
Finally, change detection for the current view is responsible for starting change detection for child views (operation 8). This is the place where state of the child component view is checked and if it’s ChecksEnabled, then for this view the change detection is performed. Here is the relevant code:
viewState = view.state;
...
case ViewAction.CheckAndUpdate:
if ((viewState & ViewState.ChecksEnabled) &&
(viewState & (ViewState.Errored | ViewState.Destroyed)) === 0) {
checkAndUpdateView(view);
}
}
Now you know that view state controls whether change detection is performed for this view and its children or not. So the question begs — can we control that state? It turns out we can and this is what the second part of this article is about.
Let’s assume that we have the following components tree:
As we learnt above, each component is associated with a component view. Each view is initialized with the ViewState.ChecksEnabled which means when angular runs change detection every component in the tree will be checked.
Suppose we want to disable change detection for the AComponent and its children. That’s easy to do — we just need to set ViewState.ChecksEnabled to false. Changing state is a low-level operation, so Angular provides for us a bunch of public methods available on the view. Every component can get a hold of its associated view through ChangeDetectorRef token. For this class Angular docs define the following public interface:
class ChangeDetectorRef {
markForCheck() : void
detach() : void
reattach() : void
detectChanges() : void
checkNoChanges() : void
}
Let’s see what we can wrangle it to our benefit.
detach
The first method that allows us manipulating the state is detach which simply disables checks for the current view:
detach(): void { this._view.state &= ~ViewState.ChecksEnabled; }
Let’s see how it can be used in the code:
export class AComponent {
constructor(public cd: ChangeDetectorRef) {
this.cd.detach();
}
This ensures that during the following change detection runs the left branch starting with AComponent will be skipped (orange components will not be checked):
There are two things to note here — first is that even though we changed state for AComponent, all its child components will not be checked as well. Second is that since no change detection will be performed for the left branch components, DOM in their templates will not be updated as well. Here is the small example to demonstrate it:
@Component({
selector: 'a-comp',
template: `<span>See if I change: {{changed}}</span>`
})
export class AComponent {
constructor(public cd: ChangeDetectorRef) {
this.changed = 'false';
setTimeout(() => {
this.cd.detach();
this.changed = 'true';
}, 2000);
}
The first time the component is checked the span will be rendered with the text See if I change: false. And within two seconds when changed property is updated to true the text in the span will not be changed. However, if we remove this line this.cd.detach(), everything will work as expected.
reattach
As shown in the first part of the article OnChanges lifecycle hook will still be triggered for AComponent if input binding aProp changes on the AppComponent. This means that once we are notified that input properties change, we can activate change detector for the current component to run change detection and detach it on the next tick. Here is the snippet demonstrating that:
export class AComponent {
@Input() inputAProp;
constructor(public cd: ChangeDetectorRef) {
this.cd.detach();
}
ngOnChanges(values) {
this.cd.reattach();
setTimeout(() => {
this.cd.detach();
})
}
Since reattach simply sets ViewState.ChecksEnabled bit:
reattach(): void { this._view.state |= ViewState.ChecksEnabled; }
this is almost equivalent to what is done when ChangeDetectionStrategy is set to OnPush: disable check after the first change detection run, enable it when parent component bound property changes and disable after the run.
Please note that OnChanges hook is only triggered for the top-most component in the disabled branch, not for every component in the disabled branch.
markForCheck
The reattach method enables checks for the current component only, but if changed detection is not enabled for its parent component, it will have no effect. It means that reattach method is only useful for top-most component in the disabled branch.
We need a way to enable check for all parent components up to root component. And there is a method for it markForCheck:
let currView: ViewData|null = view;
while (currView) {
if (currView.def.flags & ViewFlags.OnPush) {
currView.state |= ViewState.ChecksEnabled;
}
currView = currView.viewContainerParent || currView.parent;
}
As you can see from the implementation, it simply iterates upwards and enables checks for every parent component up to the root.
detectChanges
There is a way to run change detection once for the current component and all its children. This is done using detectChanges method. This method runs change detection for the current component view regardless of its state, which means that checks may remain disabled for the current view and component will not be checked during following regular change detection runs. Here is an example:
export class AComponent {
@Input() inputAProp;
constructor(public cd: ChangeDetectorRef) {
this.cd.detach();
}
ngOnChanges(values) {
this.cd.detectChanges();
}
DOM is updated when input property changes even though change detector reference remains detached.
checkNoChanges
This last method available on the change detector ensures that there will be no changes done on the current run of change detection. Basically, it performs 1,7,8 operations from the list in the first article and throws an exception if it finds a changed binding or determines that DOM should be updated.
P.S.
If you’ve made this far I’ve probably written a useful article. Don’t hesitate to recommend it. I am the guy who likes to dig deep to understand things. So if you’d like to get notified whenever I find some insights worth sharing — do follow me. Thanks!