US v. Bankman-Fried: Justice shall be served, concluded the unforgiving indictment against SBF

Written by legalpdf | Published 2022/12/16
Tech Story Tags: sam-bankman-fried | sbf | alameda | cryptocurrency | ftx | ftx-bankruptcy | forfeiture-allegations | good-old-fraud | hackernoon-es | hackernoon-hi | hackernoon-zh | hackernoon-vi | hackernoon-fr | hackernoon-pt | hackernoon-ja

TLDRUS v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 Court Filing, Dec 13 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. This is part 9 of 9: FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONSvia the TL;DR App

US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 Court Filing, Dec 13 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 9 of 9.


Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Midjourney AI, Prompt “justice shall be served”

FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS

  1. As a result of committing the offenses alleged in Counts One, Two, Three, and Four of this Indictment, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 (a) (1) (C) and Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461 (c), any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of said offenses, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of said offenses.

  1. As a result of committing the offense alleged in Count Seven of this Indictment, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a) (1), any and all property, real and personal, involved in said offense, or any property traceable to such property, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of property involved in said offense.

  2. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant: (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853 (p) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the above forfeitable property.

(Title 18, United States Code, Section 982; Title 21, United States Code, Section 853; and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461.)


Form No. USA-338-274 (EA. 9-25-58)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF”, Defendant

SEALED INDICTMENT 22 cr.(Title 7, United States Code, Sections 9(1) and 13(a) (5); Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 180.1; Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5; Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 1343, 1349, 1956, and-1957; Title 52, United states Code, Sections 30118, 30122 and 30109(d)(1)(A) & (D).)


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.

This court case (US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 (Abrams), retrieved on Dec 15 2022) is part of the public domain. The court-created documents provided by PACER are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.


Written by legalpdf | Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.
Published by HackerNoon on 2022/12/16